Day 2: Route |
Saturday 10 May, 18.4
km, 667 metres, 7 hours 45 minutes
Weather: Pretty wet, drying up in the afternoon. Sort of.
View from the Scarp (taken on the previous evening) |
One of the less than pleasurable aspects of wild camping is
the early morning walk with the MSR Blizzard stake, with the improvised duct
tape handle, to a place remote from other tents and water courses for a man to
do what a man has to do. Not too bad on a dry day, it is most unpleasant when it
is raining. So I can tell you that
having wandered off from my tent at 5.50am in the dry to undertake aforementioned
euphemism I felt pretty smug 15 minutes later as I lay back in my sleeping bag
with a brew and it started to tip it down.
It continued to rain throughout the morning, which was no
surprise, this being Scotland in May and Challengers all along the north west of the country were just getting on with it. I
headed off along the track towards Loch Affric, eventually catching up with
Fran and Allen near the track that turns away from the Loch and heads up towards
Cougie. I only caught up with them because they were repairing Fran's boots again. I walked with them through an increasingly unpleasant, steep, wet and muddy excuse
of a path to the main track that heads to Cougie.
Allen scoured the track for old bits of wire
and cable ties to add to his boot repair kit for Fran. We stopped near Cougie for lunch. After getting very fed up of trail mix and
too many cereal bars on previous backpacks I have started to buy wraps for lunch and
spread these with Primula Cheese. This is far more satisfying. I am also packing my mug so that it is more
accessible to encourage me to drink more water when passing burns.
It’s a new Evernew mug, bought just before the off. It did make an annoying grating sound whenever
I unfolded the handles but I found that a tiny squirt of Primula down the
titanium channel that holds them in place sorted this.
We followed a track up the hill out of Cougie. It disappeared long before the Ordnance Survey said that
it should, and despite the use of GPS to check we were on this “path” we waded
through heather and bog for a goodly bit ie a couple of hours or so. I can only think that the OS map makers, who
now use satellite imagery to plot features such as paths, were using the same
satellite that had told master blogger Alan Sloman that there was a brilliant wild camp in the middle of a Cumbrian wasteland on the Pre-Walk Daunder in
April. Not that I’m bitter, you understand.
I had planned to camp by the Allt na Muic and not far from
the grid reference given on my route plan I did see a pretty reasonable spot. Allen wanted to “push on for a bit” so I was
deprived of his and Fran's excellent company and settled down to a wild camp alone – the only
time on this Challenge when my tent was on its own.
I spent an interesting evening. I foolishly left my tent door open as I went
for a short wander to the burn for water and when I returned it was filled with large
numbers of flying ants who, it seemed had needed to “get a room”. They were hell bent on using the Scarp for
immoral purposes, and despite shooing as many of them as possible away I had to
lie in my sleeping bag watching the remaining swarm with voyeuristic
fascination as they cavorted and copulated on the sides of my inner tent until
tiredness saw me drift to the land of nod.
Wild camp pitch near the Allt na Muic |
Chris: I have this theory - a theory by Anne Elk.
ReplyDeleteAhem!
This theory, Chris, is that that Ordnance Bloody Survey, Chris, have never ever visited Scotland.
Paths???
Don't make me laugh!
Chris? Who the fek is Chris?
DeleteBut this theory may be true. Perhaps the OS surveyors never go North of the M6 junction 40. Well the Lakes are very pretty.
PARFS???
DeleteLARF my Arse Orf.
Bleeding streams they is sir an no mistakin.
Streams...and bogs. They should make it compulsory for OS men and women to walk everything shown on a map as a path. That would learn 'em.
DeleteMy Theory by Ann Elk
ReplyDeleteAh. With you now! It wasn't much of a theory - but yours may be spot on :-)
ReplyDelete